Recently in Defective Drugs Category

XROCK Recalling Male Enhancement Supplement

April 22, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

XROCK INDUSTRIES is recalling a product that it has marketed as a dietary supplement to support male sexual performance. The product contains two undeclared and potentially hazardous ingredients.

The product, X-ROCK for men, has been determined to contain sildenafil and hydroxythiohomosildenafil. Sildenafil is an active ingredient in FDA-approved prescription drugs used to treat erectile dysfunction.

Similarly, hydroxythiohomosildenafil is an active ingredient used to treat erectile disfunction. It has the potential to interact with nitrates such as nitroglycerin, a drug commonly used by men who may also suffer from erectile dysfunction.

Continue reading "XROCK Recalling Male Enhancement Supplement " »

Another Recall From Franck's Laboratory

April 17, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

We first brought you the news of a recall from Franck's Compounding Lab in mid-March here. That recall was due to fungal eye infections related to the use of Brillian Blue G, a product used for certain eye surgeries.

This new recall appears to be limited to products sent to five physicians and the physicians have been notified. Scant details have been released by the lab, only that it effected one lot of triamcinolone acetonide and that it too involved "a fungal issue."

Triamcinolone acetonide is a steroid used to treat certain skin conditions.

Continue reading "Another Recall From Franck's Laboratory" »

Recalls & Corporate Responsibilities

March 30, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

Recalls are issued for defective consumer products, prescription drugs and medical devices every day. Typically, recalls are initiated after a company receives reports of injuries or deaths associated with the use of its product. A company's duty to protect the health and safety of the public requires it to take immediate action upon being informed of a potential defect with its product. Issuing a recall is an important first step in fulfilling this duty. However, if the FDA regulates the product, the recall triggers a host of corporate duties under Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

During the initial phases of a recall, a committee of FDA scientists evaluate the health hazard presented by the product being recalled. Based on this evaluation, the FDA assigns a numerical designation, i.e. I, II, or III, to the product to indicate the degree of health risk the product poses to consumers. A Class I recall is the most serious type of recall. The FDA uses this high-risk distinction only when there is a reasonable probability that the product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death. Class II recalls are reserved for those products that may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or if the risk of serious adverse health consequences are remote. A recall product is given a Class III designation if exposure to, or use of, the product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences.

For any class of recall, the FDA's main goal is to ensure that the actions taken by the company are adequate to protect the public health. To achieve this goal, every recall is carried out according to an FDA approved recall strategy. A recall strategy is a planned course of action tailored specifically to the recalled product.

The duty to develop a recall strategy depends upon who initiates the recall. The FDA would develop the strategy if it requests the recall; however, such a request is reserved for very urgent situations and is rarely employed. The FDA views most recalls as a voluntary action taken by manufacturers and distributors to carry out their responsibility to protect the public health and well being from products that present a risk of injury to consumers. During a voluntary recall, the initiating firm must develop the recall strategy, which is subject to FDA approval. Regardless of who develops the strategy, certain elements must be taken into account. These elements include: depth of the recall, i.e. degree of hazard and extent of distribution; need for public warnings; and the extent and effectiveness of oversight.

A recall's classification determines not only the steps the company has to take but also the level of FDA oversight. For example, in a Class I recall, the FDA conducts a number of audits to make sure the company's recall efforts are appropriate and effective. However, the level of involvement and timing of the FDA's intervention does not change the company's obligation to take appropriate action. Ultimately, the responsibility for an adequate recall belongs to the manufacturer or distributor.

Manufacturers and distributers of defective products, medical devices and prescription drugs are wholly responsible for the damages these products inflict on innocent consumers. Liability may also arise if the company initiates a recall and then fails to follow through and comply with appropriate FDA recall procedures. The voluntary nature of a recall stems from a company's duty to protect the public from defective products. Violating FDA regulations is contrary to good industry practice and places all consumers at serious risk.

The attorneys of JONES WARD PLC represent hundreds of persons all across the country who have been injured by defective products, prescription drugs and medical devices. If you or someone you know has been injured by a defective or recalled product, drug or device, contact attorney Terrance Massey. You can reach him by phone at (502) 882-6000 or by email at tj@jonesward.com.

Emergency Recall--Brilliant Blue G May Cause Fungal Eye Infections

March 16, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

Brilliant Blue G is a dye that may be used by eye surgeons in certain procedures. The FDA has announced an Urgent Product Recall of Brilliant Blue G from Franck's Lab. The maker has received reports of fungal eye infections in patients treated with Brilliant Blue G.

Doctors with remaining supplies of Brilliant Blue G subject to the recall have been asked to quarantine the product immediately and return it to Frank's Lab

Continue reading "Emergency Recall--Brilliant Blue G May Cause Fungal Eye Infections" »

Yaz DVT Lawsuits On The Rise

March 15, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

Lawsuits by women who experienced a DVT after taking Yaz are growing in numbers. A DVT (deep vein thrombosis) is one of the worst side effects of Yaz, Yasmin and the generic version, Ocella. Hundreds of women who have taken these drugs and experienced a DVT have filed suit against the drug manufacturer Bayer and are likely to receive a large settlement award.

A deep vein thrombosis is a serious condition where a blood clot forms inside a vein. DVTs are very serious and can be deadly. These clots typically form in the lower leg or thigh, but can travel to other areas of the body. DVTs are also known as venous thromboembolic events, or VTEs.

The signs and symptoms of a DVT can appear in one or both legs and include:

  • Pain or tenderness that may only occur while standing or walking
  • Swelling
  • Red, discolored or warm skin
  • Leg fatigue
  • Visible surface veins

DVTs can be life threatening and women experiencing symptoms of a DVT should seek immediate medical care.

Numerous studies have found a direct link between Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella and DVTs. The strong connection between the ingestion of these drugs and such a serious condition has subjected Bayer to civil liability. Women who experienced a DVT after taking these birth control pills may be entitled to financial compensation.

I strongly advise any patient who experienced a DVT while taking Yaz, Yasmin or Ocella to contact an attorney. The attorneys at JONES WARD PLC represent hundreds of women from across the country that have been harmed by Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella.

If you would like to speak with someone about a potential case, please call attorney Terrance Massey at JONES WARD PLC. He can be reached by phone at 502-882-6000 or by email at tj@jonesward.com.

New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds $10.5 Million Verdict Against Maker of Accutane

March 14, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

Last month, the highest court of New Jersey upheld a $10.5 million verdict for plaintiff Kamie S. Kendall. Kendall's lawsuit claimed that using Accutane caused her to develop ulcerative colitis.

Kendall was awarded $10.5 million by a jury in 2008. In 2009, the drug maker pulled the drug from the market in the United States.

The drug maker, Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., appealed the judgment claiming that Kendall missed her statute of limitations, which is two years in New Jersey. The court confirmed that Kendall brought her suit in time to preserve her claims.

Continue reading "New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds $10.5 Million Verdict Against Maker of Accutane" »

FDA Warns of Mercury in Anti-Aging Products

March 12, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

FDA is warning today of anti-aging products that contain mercury. The FDA says to check skin-lightening, anti-aging, or other skin products labels for mention of mercurous chloride, calomel, mercuiric, or mercurio. It has warned that consequences may be even further reaching than just to the users--infants and children may be able to get mercury in their body from breathing mercury fumes from the products. Consumers are warned that if their product contains no label, it is not safe for use.

Mercury poisoning produces the following symptoms:
-irritability
-shyness
-tremors
-changes in vision or hearing
-memory problems
-depression
-numbness and tingling in extremities.

Continue reading "FDA Warns of Mercury in Anti-Aging Products" »

Label Change for Cholesterol Drugs Highlights Dangers

March 10, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

The FDA is requiring makers of cholesterol reducing drugs to implement important label changes this week. The following three changes have been made:

1) The need for routine periodic monitoring of liver enzymes has been removed. Cholesterol drugs can cause serious injury to the liver. However, the FDA has determined that periodic checks of the liver are not required for all drug users, but only for those for who liver monitoring is otherwise indicated. For example, a patient who has a history of liver disease or alcoholism may require monitoring of liver enzymes, whereas a patient without such a history would not require it.

2) New adverse effects of the drugs have been added--memory loss, confusion, etc, as well as in increase blood sugars.

Continue reading "Label Change for Cholesterol Drugs Highlights Dangers" »

Norgestimate and Ethinyl Estradiol Birth Control Pills Recalled

March 2, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

Certain lots of Norgestimate and Ethinyl Estradiol Tablets have been recalled due to a packaging error that potentially causes the pills to be out of sequence. The recalled oral contraceptives are the Norgestimate and Ethinyl Estradiol Tablets USP, 0.18 mg/0.035 mg, 0.215 mg/0.035 mg, and 0.25 mg/0.035 mg.

According to reports, during the packaging process, the blisters were rotated 180 degrees within the card, which reversed the weekly tablet orientation. Although the packaging error does not create a health risk, it can cause the daily regimen to be incorrect and could leave women without effective contraception and at risk for an unintended pregnancy.

Continue reading "Norgestimate and Ethinyl Estradiol Birth Control Pills Recalled" »

Pradaxa Attorney: Bleeding Complications Are Dangerous

February 14, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

WARNING: If you cut yourself, you have a real risk that you may bleed to death. Go to the hospital immediately for a blood transfusion.

If the language above was in the Pradaxa label, would you buy it? I didn't think so. And neither does the maker of Pradaxa. If they included the language above, their sales would plummet. So what does the company do, they minimize the very serious risk of death and/or blood transfusions in the Pradaxa label.

Is that right? Is it fair? I don't think so. And lawyers across the country don't think so. In fact, Pradaxa attorneys across the country are hearing from the families of Pradaxa users who have suffered serious injuries and death because of this drug. Unlike it competitors, Pradaxa has no antidote for uncontrollable bleeding. There are no medicines that can cause the blood to coagulate and stop the bleeding naturally.

If you or a family member has been injured or killed because of uncontrollable bleeding caused by Pradaxa, contact Pradaxa attorney Larry Jones by clicking here.

Yaz Yasmin Settlement: Lawyer says Gallbladder Patients are being ignored

February 14, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

What's a gallbladder worth? This is the question that I've heard over and over and over again as it relates to the Yas, Yasmin and Ocella settlement discussions currently taking place across the country. Bayer (the maker of Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella) says a gallbladder is worth zero, nothing, nada, zip. Bayer says that the woman who lost their gallbladders were fat, out of shape, old, and generally unhealthy. Bayer says that they are not responsible for gallbladder losses because there are no epidemiological studies showing an increased risk of gallbladder disease in Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella users.

What do I say? Bring it on. A gallbladder removal is a very serious injury. I represent teenagers, as well as middle-aged women, in the Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella litigation. They aren't all fat or old or out of shape. Indeed, there are thousands of young woman (pretty, thin, and in shape) who have lost their gallbladders. These women had no prior health history that would suggest gallbladder disease. These women never knew that they were at risk. The women never knew that a Canadian Medical Association published a study that found that there was a "statistically significant" increase in gallbladder disease for Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella users when compared to other oral contraceptives.

So what's it worth? I'm an experienced trial lawyer. I can try these cases. I can't imagine that a jury would not award six figure verdicts. So when Bayer comes knocking at my door, they better be ready to negotiate reasonable settlements. If not, I'll go to court and try my cases on behalf of my gallbladder clients. We don't plan on letting them get away with endangering our daughters, moms, aunts, and nieces who have used Yas, Yasmin and Ocella.

Tekturna Valturna Lawsuit: What went wrong at Novartis?

February 14, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

In a previous blog post http://www.the-recall-lawyers.com/2012/01/tekturna-recall-lawyer-says-la.html I detailed what Novartis did wrong. They marketed a drug to diabetics that was not FDA-approved for usage by diabetics. By marketing "off-label" to these users, Novartis engaged in conduct that was reckless, irresponsible and illegal.

There are many diabetics throughout the country who were convinced to use Tekturna, Valturna and TekAmlo by their doctors, who were led to believe that the drug would not only help their blood pressure, but that would also help with renal issues. The problem: there was no scientific evidence that showed it was safe to use with diabetics or that it actually helped with renal problems.

Novartis commenced clinical trials that tested the safety of diabetic usage. Unfortunately, they learned during the trials that the drug was not safe; indeed, it was dangerous. The trials were suspended because of the high number of diabetics who suffered strokes, renal problems, and other issues during the trials.

So what should happen to Novartis? Well, Novartis is a frequent offender. It is time for Novartis to be held responsible for their conduct. That's where we come in. Jones Ward PLC regularly files lawsuits against the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. Some say that lawyers are after money. We feel otherwise. We believe in holding corporations accountable for conduct that puts our families and yours at risk every single day --and all in the name of profits. Of course we get paid. But that isn't what it is all about. The payments we receive from our work allows us to hire more attorneys that can help us get justice for our clients and accountability from the companies.

Day in and day out, I look at internal documents from pharmaceutical companies. I see how many of these companies blatantly cross the line, and break the law, all in the name of higher profits. The results? It puts all of us at risk.

So if anyone ever says that lawyers are greedy and no good. You tell them that without the lawyers the pharma companies would have no incentive to make safe products and they would never be held accountable.

For more information about Jones Ward PLC and what we do, contact Larry Jones at larry@jonesward.com.

Reglan (Metoclopramide) Attorneys

February 4, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

Jones Ward PLC is actively litigating nearly 100 cases across the country (mainly in Boston, Philadelphia and St. Louis) related to the use if Reglan (metoclopramide) and its link to the tragic muscle movement disorder known as tardive dyskinesia. Much of the litigation is centered on the generic manufacturers of metoclopramide, who claim that they had no duty to contact the FDA and request a label change despite very clear evidence that the metoclopramide was linked to tardive dyskinesia. For more information from the FDA, check out this link: http://youtu.be/dum81RdFrhM

There is much more to this story. If you would like to know more, don't hesitate to send me an email at larry@jonesward.com


Recent Study: Statins May Increase Chance of Diabetes in Women

January 29, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

A recent study found new evidence that statins could increase women's risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Tens of millions of Americans take Statins to lower cholesterol levels. Crestor, Lipitor, and Zocor are the most popular of these medications that reduce the risk of heart disease and stroke. A recent study that followed more than 150,000 women over the age of 50, with and without heart disease, found that those taking statin drugs had a 48 percent greater chance of developing type 2 diabetes. Physicians do not know why statins increase diabetes, and the research does not implicate any single brand; however, these findings appear to confirm prior smaller studies.

Continue reading "Recent Study: Statins May Increase Chance of Diabetes in Women" »

December 2011 Drug Label Changes

January 29, 2012, by JONES WARD PLC

In December forty medical products underwent label revisions, with changes to the prescribing information to include any of the following areas: boxed warnings, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse reactions, patient package insert, and medication guide.

The following medications have been affected:

  • Multaq (dronedarone hydrochloride) tablets

  • Dilantin-125 (phenytoin) Oral Suspension

  • Norvir (ritonavir) Soft Gel Capsules, Oral Solution and Tablets

  • Relenza (zanamivir) inhalation powder

  • Tyzeka (telbivudine) tablets and oral solution

  • Capoten (captopril) Tablets 

  • Danocrine brand of Danazol capsules

  • Desferal (deferoxamine mesylate) for injection

  • Edarbi (azilsartan medoxomil) Tablets

  • Eloxatin (oxaliplatin) for intravenous use

  • Heparin Sodium Injection

  • Isentress (raltegravir) scored, chewable tablets, film-coated tablet 

  • Keppra (levetiracetam) Tablets and oral solution 

  • Onglyza (saxagliptin) tablets

  • Ovide (malathion) 0.5% lotion1 

  • PegIntron (Peginterferon alfa-2b) Injection, Powder for Solution for Subcutaneous Use

  • Plavix (clopidogrel bisulfate) tablets

  • Remeron (mirtazapine) tablets and RemeronSolTab (mirtazapine) Orally Disintegrating 

  • Zegerid (omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate) powder for oral suspension and capsules

The attorneys of Jones Ward PLC represent hundreds of persons all across the country who have been injured by defective products, prescription drugs and medical devices. If you or someone you know has been injured by one of the above prescription drugs or any other type of product, contact attorney Terrance Massey. You can reach him by phone at (502) 882-6000 or by email at tj@jonesward.com.